Kim Jones, under a black tent, like the sadness of the world, with a white staircase as a backdrop, Potemkin staircase style, a stripped-down décor to better highlight the fabrics and the construction of the fundamentals that distinguish the luxury of clothes as opposed to those of Zara. From a distance, looks are uncluttered, monochrome, sober at first glance, like this monastic black coat worn with a Yamamoto-style long skirt – the Catholicism is back. But if you zoomed in on the details, which even the front row had trouble seeing, you could spot details like these glass beads scattered like raindrops on the shoulders of a navy blue suit, the tears of luxury perhaps!
Diving into the archives makes sense at a time when many designers are redoubling their efforts to win back luxury consumers disappointed by the poverty of creations, because high-end basics ranging from €800 t-shirts to €4,500 coats are no longer in vogue, and at these prices, they’d better please. That’s probably why the more streamlined designs are given a touch of originality, often drawn from the women’s fashion lexicon of the old haute couture school.
In the 18th century, it was not uncommon to see fashionable men wearing brightly coloured silk damask coats. Jones revitalized this idea with belted kimono jackets and a pink satin robe embroidered with a motif borrowed at the Pondicherry dress from Christian Dior collection 1948.